This is code snippets for creating galaxy tool wrappers for R scripts that produce one or more images as output. For now, just the code.
See about the files_path property of outputs, in the FAQ.
As blogged earlier, I'm currently into parsing the syntax of some definitions for the parameters and stuff of command line tools. As said in the linked blog post, I was pondering whether to use the Galaxy Toolconfig format or the DocBook CmdSynopsis format. It turned out though Well, that cmdsynopsis lacks the option to specify a list of valid choices, for a parameter, as is possible in the Galaxy ToolConfig format (see here), and thus can be used to generate drop-down lists in wizards etc. which is basically what I want to do ... so, now I'm going with the Galaxy format after all.
Enter the Galaxy format then. Look at an example code snippet:
<tool id="sam_to_bam" name="SAM-to-BAM" version="1.1.1"> <description>converts SAM format to BAM format</description> <requirements> <requirement type="package">samtools</requirement> </requirements> <command interpreter="python"> sam_to_bam.py --input1=$source.input1 --dbkey=${input1.metadata.dbkey} #if $source.index_source == "history": --ref_file=$source.ref_file #else --ref_file="None" #end if --output1=$output1 --index_dir=${GALAXY_DATA_INDEX_DIR} </command> <inputs> <conditional name="source"> <param name="index_source" type="select" label="Choose the source for the reference list"> <option value="cached">Locally cached</option> <option value="history">History</option> </param> <when value="cached"> ... cont ...
Here I've got some challenges. XML parsing is easy, even in Java (I use the Java XPath libs for that). But look inside the <command>
tag ... that's some really non-xml stuff, no? (it is instructions for a python based template library, used in galaxy). I have to parse this though, in order to replicate the logic of it ... so what to do? ... well, I turned to the ANTLR Parser Generator.
I heard a lot of good things about ANTLR, like that it is more easily debugged than typical BNF parsers etc, so the choice wasn't that hard. I tried the ANTLR for Eclipse, but though it looks nice, it that was quite buggy, and I couldnt get it to work properly in neither Eclipse 3.5 or 3.6. So, finally I went with the easy option and developed my EBNF grammar in ANTLRWorks, which is an integrated Java App, with the correct ANTLR lib already installed etc. Turned out to work really good!
The grammar I came up with so far (only for the syntax inside the <command> tag so far, though!) is available on GitHub ... and below (in condensed syntax to save some space), for you convenience :)
grammar GalaxyToolConfig; options {output=AST;} command : binary (ifstatement param+ (ELSE param+)? ENDIF | param)*; binary : WORD; ifstatement : IF (STRING|VARIABLE) EQTEST (STRING|VARIABLE) COLON; param : DBLDASH WORD* EQ (VARIABLE|STRING); WORD : ('a'..'z'|'A'..'Z')('a'..'z'|'A'..'Z'|'.'|'_'|'0'..'9')*; VARIABLE : '$'('{')?WORD('}')?; STRING : '"'('a'..'z'|'A'..'Z')+'"'; IF : '#if'; ELSE : '#else'; ENDIF : '#end if'; EQ : '='; EQTEST : '=='; DBLDASH : '--'; COLON : ':'; WS : (' '|'\t'|'\r'|'\n') {$channel=HIDDEN;};
Suggestions for improvements? :) ... Then go ahead and mail me ... samuel dot lampa at gmail dot com)
Also, see a little screenshot from ANTLRWorks below:
As you can see in the screenshot, the different parts have correctly been identified as "param", "if statement" and so forth. You can se also how I can click in the test syntax, to see where in the parse tree that actual part appears.
When done, I just exported the resulting parser code in ANTLRWorks with "Generate > Generate Code", copied the code from the "output" folder into my Eclipse project, added the antlr-3.3 jar into the build path of it, and then ran the __Test__.java file that comes with the output.
I wanted to do a little more parsing in my test though, so I ended up with this little test code:
package net.bioclipse.uppmax.galaxytoolconfigparser; import org.antlr.grammar.v3.*; import org.antlr.runtime.ANTLRStringStream; import org.antlr.runtime.CharStream; import org.antlr.runtime.CommonTokenStream; import org.antlr.runtime.RecognitionException; import org.antlr.runtime.TokenStream; import org.antlr.runtime.tree.CommonTree; import org.antlr.runtime.tree.DOTTreeGenerator; import org.antlr.runtime.tree.Tree; import org.antlr.runtime.tree.TreeAdaptor; import org.antlr.stringtemplate.StringTemplate; public class ParseTest { // Generated stuff from ANTLR, which I can use to recognize token types public static final int EOF=-1; public static final int ELSE=4; public static final int ENDIF=5; public static final int WORD=6; public static final int IF=7; public static final int STRING=8; public static final int VARIABLE=9; public static final int EQTEST=10; public static final int COLON=11; public static final int DBLDASH=12; public static final int EQ=13; public static final int WS=14; public static void main(String[] args) throws RecognitionException { String testString = " sam_to_bam.py" + " --input1=$source.input1\n" + " --dbkey=${input1.metadata.dbkey}\n" + " #if $source.index_source == \"history\":\n" + " --ref_file=$source.ref_file\n" + " #else\n" + " --ref_file=\"None\"\n" + " #end if\n" + " --output1=$output1\n" + " --index_dir=${GALAXY_DATA_INDEX_DIR}\n"; CharStream charStream = new ANTLRStringStream(testString); GalaxyToolConfigLexer lexer = new GalaxyToolConfigLexer(charStream); TokenStream tokenStream = new CommonTokenStream(lexer); GalaxyToolConfigParser parser = new GalaxyToolConfigParser(tokenStream, null); System.out.println("Starting to parse ..."); // GalaxyToolConfigParser.command_return command = parser.command(); CommonTree tree = (CommonTree)parser.command().getTree(); System.out.println("Done parsing ..."); int i = 0; while (i<tree.getChildCount()) { Tree subTree = tree.getChild(i); System.out.println("Tree child: " + subTree.getText() + ", (Token type: " + subTree.getType() + ")"); i++; } // Generate DOT Syntax tree //DOTTreeGenerator gen = new DOTTreeGenerator(); //StringTemplate st = gen.toDOT(tree); //System.out.println("Tree: \n" + st); System.out.println("Done!"); } }
... generating this output:
Starting ... Done executing command ... Subtree text: sam_to_bam.py, (Token type: 6) Subtree text: --, (Token type: 12) Subtree text: input1, (Token type: 6) Subtree text: =, (Token type: 13) Subtree text: $source.input1, (Token type: 9) Subtree text: --, (Token type: 12) Subtree text: dbkey, (Token type: 6) Subtree text: =, (Token type: 13) Subtree text: ${input1.metadata.dbkey}, (Token type: 9) Subtree text: #if, (Token type: 7) Subtree text: $source.index_source, (Token type: 9) Subtree text: ==, (Token type: 10) Subtree text: "history", (Token type: 8) Subtree text: :, (Token type: 11) Subtree text: --, (Token type: 12) Subtree text: ref_file, (Token type: 6) Subtree text: =, (Token type: 13) Subtree text: $source.ref_file, (Token type: 9) Subtree text: #else, (Token type: 4) Subtree text: --, (Token type: 12) Subtree text: ref_file, (Token type: 6) Subtree text: =, (Token type: 13) Subtree text: "None", (Token type: 8) Subtree text: #end if, (Token type: 5) Subtree text: --, (Token type: 12) Subtree text: output1, (Token type: 6) Subtree text: =, (Token type: 13) Subtree text: $output1, (Token type: 9) Subtree text: --, (Token type: 12) Subtree text: index_dir, (Token type: 6) Subtree text: =, (Token type: 13) Subtree text: ${GALAXY_DATA_INDEX_DIR}, (Token type: 9) Done!
... seemingly I have the stuff I need, for doing some logic parsing now! :)
ANTLR is an (E)BNF parser generator. I had heard a little about BNF before, and was more or less scared off from the topic, thinking it looked too advanced, but really, I found it isn't that hard at all!
It strikes me that BNF is quite much RegEx but with functions added, which allows for recursive pattern matching, which you'll need for anything more advanced, such as nested braces/xml tags etc ... but as you can see in the example above also, much of the pattern matching syntax actually has big similarities to RegEx.
In terms of tutorials, for the (E)BNF/ANTLR combo at least, I'd highly recommend this set of screencasts on using ANTLR in Eclipse. Though I didn't use the Eclipse version, these screencasts quickly give you an idea of how it all works ... I watched at least a bunch of them, and I'm happy I did.
As blogged about before, I was interested in knowing the difference between the Galaxy Toolconfig, and the DocBook cmdsynopsis format, for the purpose of automatically generating wizards (see an example that I screencasted here) to fill in the required parameters to command line tools. To quickly get some hands-on experience with the formats, I started creating an XSLT transformation from galaxy toolconfig format to the docbook cmdsynopsis format.
I quite quickly realized some important differences, such as that cmdsynopsis lacks the ability to specify a list of possible/valid options for a parameter, which could be used for creating drop-downs in the wizards. But apart from that, the little work on the transformation I had already done when realizing this, actually was a nice little exercise in using regex with xslt. Look at the command tag content in this excerpt of a Galaxy ToolConfig XML file:
<tool id="sam_to_bam" name="SAM-to-BAM" version="1.1.1"> <description>converts SAM format to BAM format</description> <requirements> <requirement type="package">samtools</requirement> </requirements> <command interpreter="python"> sam_to_bam.py --input1=$source.input1 --dbkey=${input1.metadata.dbkey} #if $source.index_source == "history": --ref_file=$source.ref_file #else --ref_file="None" #end if --output1=$output1 --index_dir=${GALAXY_DATA_INDEX_DIR} </command> <inputs> <conditional name="source"> <param name="index_source" type="select" label="Choose the source for the reference list"> <option value="cached">Locally cached</option> <option value="history">History</option> </param> <when value="cached"> <param name="input1" type="data" format="sam" label="SAM File to Convert"> <validator type="unspecified_build" /> <validator type="dataset_metadata_in_file" filename="sam_fa_indices.loc" metadata_name="dbkey" metadata_column="1" message="Sequences are not currently available for the specified build." line_startswith="index" /> </param> </when> <when value="history"> <param name="input1" type="data" format="sam" label="Convert SAM file" /> <param name="ref_file" type="data" format="fasta" label="Using reference file" /> </when> </conditional> </inputs> <outputs> <data format="bam" name="output1" label="${tool.name} on ${on_string}: converted BAM" /> </outputs> </xml>
... you see that in the command tag, the actual syntax of the command is specified in a kind of "free text" format ... This might not be exactly what one might think to use XSLT transformations for, but together with the regex functionality in XSLT 2.0 you definitely has this option too. Helped by this article on xml.com, I put together this little XSLT stylesheet for parsing up the free text content of that command tag (haven't got to the more detailed config inside the inputs-tag in the galaxy format, but might not need either, if staying with the galaxy format anyway):
<?xml version="1.0"?> <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" version="2.0"> <xsl:output method="xml" indent="yes" encoding="UTF-8" /> <xsl:template match="/"> <cmdsynopsis> <xsl:apply-templates select="tool/command" /> </cmdsynopsis> </xsl:template> <xsl:template match="tool/command"> <command> <xsl:value-of select="@interpreter" /> </command> <xsl:for-each select='tokenize( replace( replace( replace( replace( ., "[ ]+", ""), "\n#[^\s]+", ""), "\n+", " "), "(^\s+|\s+$)", ""), "\s")'> <xsl:if test='matches(.,"\{")!=true()'> <arg> <xsl:value-of select='replace(.,"=.*","")'></xsl:value-of> <xsl:if test='matches(.,".*=.*")'> <xsl:text> </xsl:text> <replaceable> <xsl:value-of select='replace(.,".*=\s*\$?","")'></xsl:value-of> </replaceable> </xsl:if> </arg> </xsl:if> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet>
... a bit crazy with all these nested regex replace function calls, no? :) ... but, I can tell you, it actually works very good! Found it easier to work with than many other regex implementations (i.e. matching newlines could be done with "\n", which I think you can't do by default in some other ones).
I can also mention that the tokenize function splits a string into an "array" of the parts between the parts that is matched by the expression given to tokenize (similar to "split" in some other languages, like python).
The result of the transoformation? Here it goes:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <cmdsynopsis> <command>python</command> <arg>sam_to_bam.py</arg> <arg>--input1 <replaceable>source.input1</replaceable> </arg> <arg>--ref_file <replaceable>source.ref_file</replaceable> </arg> <arg>--ref_file <replaceable>"None"</replaceable> </arg> <arg>--output1 <replaceable>output1</replaceable> </arg> </cmdsynopsis>
Not perfect (there are double "--ref_file" arguments still), but at least it has parsed up the different arguments, removed some galaxy specific stuff (the parts enclosed by "{}") and the conditional statements. At least I think it shows that xslt + regex is actually an option, don't you think? :)
A caveat here though: I found out that most of the XSLT processor tools for Ubuntu (xsltproc, xalan, the one built into php5) don't accept XSLT 2.0 features such as regex, so I ended up using the java based saxon processor.
To call it for doing a transformation, you simply go (when using the open source "home edition"):
java -jar saxon9he.jar [xml-file] [xslt-file] > [output-file]
Works good! (does a good job of formatting the XML too).
Time for a little more "overview" like status update of the Bioclipse HPC Client part of the FIMS Project I'm working on for UPPNEX at UPPMAX.
Right now I'm hacking away on the batch job config wizard (just fixed a "select remote file" dialog, for file path parameters, which I actually even screencasted :=)).
Otherwise, I start coming to the stage when I need to do a decision about command line tool wrapper formats.
So far I've tried to use the Galaxy (bioinformatics portal) XML format, hoping to take advantage of the vast number of already wrapped bioinformatics tools (Actually, I'm using the format now - that is what drives the wizard in the Bioclipsescreencast above).
Unfortunately though, I figured out that most (if not all?) tool configs in Galaxy do not wrap the command line tool itself, but rather an accompanying script file (python/bash/perl), that does some additional stuff (different for each tool), which makes it hard to use the tool configs right away outside the galaxy platform.
So, realizing this, I'm considering whether we should go for something even more general, for this light-weight batch config wizard (which is not trying to be a complete replacement for Galaxy).
I actually just got to know about another such format (via a question on stack overflow). Apparently the docbook-package contains such a format! So, in case one would find that there are lots of ready-made such docbook-definitions for a bunch of cli tools already, then this could be quite interesting. ... so that's something I'll check in now. Otherwise, I maybe might as well stick with the Galaxy format (Have to admit though that the docbook one feels like a more general choice, in the general sense ... or what do you think?).
Then one could of course also have converters between the DocBook and Galaxy xml formats too ... should be pretty straight-forward with XSLT.
Ok, so that's where I am, and what I'm thinking about right now! Feel free to drop a line of feedback!